This year's choice of presidential candidates being offered by the two
major political parties could not be more unorthodox, and clearly there
are things about both of them not to like.
GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump
is lewd, has no filter whatsoever and prone to saying (and tweeting)
whatever immediately comes into his mind. Not a politician, Trump is the
last person many Republicans thought they'd see atop their party's
ticket in 2016.
Then there's Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton,
one of the most dishonest, scandal-ridden and unexciting candidates
that has ever run for the nation's highest office. But what makes her
especially unappealing is her "insider/establishment" pedigree.
For instance, in recent days, thanks to data dumps by whistleblower site WikiLeaks, we now know that she has conspired with the power-hungry elite and globalists to produce a "compliant citizenry" that does what they're told, when they're told, and never questions authority. These are the people 'advising' Clinton and will no doubt be part of her administration.
'Bride of Frankenfood' has a history of Monsanto collusion
Part
of citizen compliance, of course, has to do with "conspiring" with
major corporations like Monsanto to poison our food chain, dumb down the
people and ensure that any ill-effects from said food chain destruction
is kept hidden.
As we have reported, and as has been documented in this white paper by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, along with editors of NewsTarget.com, Clinton has longstanding financial ties to Monsanto.
"Hillary
Rodham Clinton's ties to agribusiness giant Monsanto, and her advocacy
for the industry's genetically modified crops, have environmentalists in
Iowa calling her 'Bride of Frankenfood'" reportedthe Washington Times
in May 2015. "A large faction of women voiced strong support for Mrs.
Clinton's candidacy until the GMO issue came up, prompting them to
switch allegiances to Sen. Bernard Sanders of Vermont, a liberal
stalwart challenging her for the Democratic nomination."
There's more, however. Clinton
repeated all of Monsanto's favorite talking points at the 2014
Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) conference. In her speech she
said she is in favor of using the company's GMO seeds and other products
that have a "proven track record," even though there are no statistics
to justify such broad praise. In fact, if anything, Monsanto's Roundup
has been associated with the creation of superweeds that are harder to
kill and are now encroaching on more crop acreage, forcing agricultural
operations to use as much as 10 times the amount of toxic herbicides
that would be used otherwise on normal, non-GMO crops.
As TruthWiki notes further:
Hillary
tries to bleed together GMO with hybrids (traditional natural breeding
methods), a typical miseducation and disinformation conversation many
other biotech shills use for propaganda, such as Bill Nye, the science
fraud guy, and Neal DeGrasse Tyson, also a known biotech huckster.
Clinton goes so far as to say during her "BIO" presentation that all
anti-GMO people are anti-science idiots who can't comprehend the
"facts."
Trump has no history of destroying the country's clean food supply
There is even more. Clinton hired Jerry Crawford, a prominent long-time Monsanto
lobbyist, to run her current presidential campaign. He is reportedly
the force behind Monsanto's regular efforts to haul small farmers into
court, in order to protect the company's growing monopoly on the world's
seed market. Also, Clinton's one-time law office, the Rose Law Firm,
represented Monsanto and other agri-business companies.
Besides
her ties to Monsanto and the influence the corporate giant would wield
in a Clinton administration, Hillary is a big believer and pusher of
phony climate change/global warming, the narrative of which has changed back and forth from "global cooling" to "global warming" and then to just "climate change" so that she and every other climate hoaxer can claim any severe weather event is due to man-made activity.
So
while both presidential candidates may have a list of undesirables, one
– Trump – at least does not have a political history of selling the
country's food supply out to corporate interests who care nothing about
clean food.
Sources:
NewsTarget.com
InfoWars.com
NaturalNews.com
WashingtonTimes.com
TruthWiki.org